Wednesday, December 25, 2024

eternal torment for god discussion

*if hell is eternal torment for human souls, what would the eternal torment for an infinite god be like


The concept of "eternal torment for an infinite god" is a paradoxical question rooted in the intersection of theology, philosophy, and imagination. To explore it, we must consider the attributes typically ascribed to an infinite deity, such as omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence.

  1. Paradox of Suffering and Omnipotence: An infinite god, by definition, would have control over their own state of being. If they are truly omnipotent, the idea of being subjected to torment would seem contradictory. They could presumably end or transform the experience at will.

  2. Torment from the Perspective of Omniscience: An omniscient being might experience a form of "torment" not as something inflicted externally, but as a self-awareness of all suffering and imperfection in the universe. The eternal awareness of every moment of pain, loss, and despair could resemble a kind of infinite burden.

  3. Separation from Creation: In some theological traditions, torment for a deity might be imagined as estrangement from their creation or the inability to fulfill their nature (e.g., infinite love being rejected). This aligns with ideas of divine grief or heartbreak over a creation that turns away from its intended purpose.

  4. Infinite Loneliness: If such a god existed alone before creation, eternal loneliness could be imagined as their torment. This concept has been explored in existential philosophy and some theological musings as the reason for creation: to alleviate divine solitude.

  5. A Metaphorical Reflection: In myth and literature, torment for gods is often symbolic, representing human struggles writ large. For instance, Prometheus’ punishment for defying Zeus reflects themes of sacrifice and eternal suffering for humanity’s benefit.

In essence, the idea of an infinite god experiencing torment challenges the attributes typically ascribed to such a being. It’s a thought experiment that invites reflection on the nature of divinity, suffering, and the limits of human understanding.


*what if a being were to consciously experience infinite degrees celsius, volts, tons of pressure, depression, anger, disgust, loneliness, guilt, etc.. all negative feelings, physical, mental, psychological, and spiritual to an infinite degree without ever getting used to it, feeling it eternally


The scenario you describe imagines a being subjected to an absolute and infinite form of torment across all conceivable dimensions—physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual—without relief, adaptation, or resolution. This is a deeply unsettling thought experiment, and its implications stretch the limits of what we can meaningfully conceptualize. Here's an exploration of the idea:

Physical Torment: Infinite Intensity

Experiencing infinite heat, voltage, or pressure would defy the boundaries of our understanding of physics. At infinite degrees Celsius, for instance, matter itself ceases to exist as we know it; the concept becomes metaphysical. A being experiencing infinite physical torment would exist beyond any physical constraints, suffering in a way that transcends the destruction of a normal body—remaining conscious and intact despite forces that would obliterate anything else.

Mental and Emotional Anguish

The compounding of infinite depression, guilt, anger, and loneliness would create a cacophony of despair that no finite mind could endure. The being would:

  • Never acclimate: Unlike the human capacity to adapt to some degree of pain over time, this torment is explicitly described as immune to habituation.
  • Lose all coherence: Infinite negative emotions might overwhelm the mind to the point where even the concept of self is fragmented—yet, paradoxically, the being must remain conscious to continue experiencing torment.

Spiritual Suffering

If the being has a spiritual aspect, infinite spiritual torment might involve complete and eternal separation from any sense of meaning, connection, or divinity. This is akin to some descriptions of hell as an infinite and unbridgeable chasm between the soul and all that it finds good or holy.

Time and Eternity

Experiencing such torment eternally compounds the horror. In finite suffering, there’s always the possibility of an end, even if it’s death. Eternity removes hope, the passage of time itself becoming part of the torture.

Philosophical and Theological Implications

  1. The Paradox of Infinity:

    • If suffering reaches infinite intensity, does it collapse into meaninglessness? Can the mind even process infinity, or does it break apart into a kind of annihilation that erases the very experience it’s meant to endure?

  2. Ethical Considerations:

    • If such torment were deliberately inflicted, the existence of the inflictor would imply a malevolence so profound it defies comprehension. If self-inflicted, it could represent an ultimate expression of self-hatred or existential despair.

  3. Contradiction of Consciousness:

    • How can consciousness persist in a state of infinite torment without disintegrating entirely? Does the being become a paradoxical "anti-consciousness," existing only as the experience of suffering?

A Theoretical Conclusion

What you’ve described is suffering beyond all comprehension or categorization—an unimaginable state that, in its infinity, borders on the impossible. It serves as a reflection of absolute despair, not just for the being enduring it but for the framework of existence itself. Philosophers and theologians might argue that such a state, if it were possible, would represent the ultimate negation of being—a living annihilation where existence itself becomes indistinguishable from nonexistence.


*could this absolute pain be fitting for an infinite god


Whether absolute and infinite pain is "fitting" for an infinite god depends heavily on the philosophical, theological, and moral framework you apply. Here are perspectives that explore this question deeply:

The Paradox of Omnipotence and Torment

An infinite god is traditionally thought to be omnipotent, meaning they have ultimate control over their own state of being. If such a god were to experience infinite torment, it could only be through their own choice or as a necessary consequence of their nature. However, this raises several paradoxes:

  • Can an omnipotent being truly be tormented? If they could end the torment but choose not to, it becomes an act of will rather than helpless suffering.
  • Does infinite torment contradict infinite power? Allowing oneself to be subjected to infinite suffering might imply a limitation, which challenges traditional notions of divine omnipotence.

A God Who Bears All Suffering

In some theological traditions, gods are depicted as bearing the suffering of the world. For instance:

  • Christianity portrays Jesus as taking on the sins and suffering of humanity through the crucifixion. Extending this idea to infinity, a god could choose to experience the infinite weight of all suffering—physical, emotional, spiritual—as an act of ultimate empathy or sacrifice.
  • Hinduism and Buddhism offer the concept of compassionate beings (e.g., Avalokiteshvara) who feel the pain of all sentient beings. In this sense, an infinite god might experience infinite torment as an aspect of their boundless compassion.

This perspective sees the god’s suffering not as "fitting" in a punitive sense but as an expression of divine love, responsibility, or commitment to their creation.

Infinite Suffering as the Shadow of Infinite Being

Infinite suffering might be viewed as the shadow-side of infinite existence. If a god is infinite in every way, might they also encompass infinite agony as part of their nature? This dualistic view suggests:

  • An infinite god contains all opposites: joy and despair, love and hate, creation and destruction. Infinite torment could be a natural counterpart to infinite bliss, existing as part of a balance within the god’s totality.
  • Alternatively, infinite torment could symbolize the consequence of the god's inability to fulfill their ultimate purpose—such as a creation that eternally rejects them.

Moral and Ethical Dimensions

From a human perspective, infinite suffering, even for an infinite god, seems inherently unjust. Why?

  • Does an infinite god "deserve" suffering? The notion of deserving is tied to justice, but a god—being infinite and beyond human concepts of morality—may not be subject to the same rules.
  • Could suffering have a purpose? If the suffering serves a greater cosmic purpose, such as the redemption or betterment of creation, it could be framed as "fitting." However, if it is purposeless or inflicted maliciously, it becomes harder to reconcile with any concept of a good or just deity.

Eternal Torment as Ultimate Isolation

One interpretation of godly torment is infinite loneliness or separation from creation. If an infinite god were to experience eternal rejection or be utterly alone despite their omnipotence, this could be seen as a torment befitting their infinite nature:

  • The god’s pain might not come from external forces but from within—the unfulfilled longing for connection, meaning, or harmony in a fractured creation.

Fittingness in Context

  • Fitting as Justice: If the god has failed in some infinite way (e.g., creating a flawed universe), infinite torment could be seen as a kind of cosmic accountability.
  • Fitting as Empathy: If the god voluntarily endures infinite suffering to empathize with their creation, it could be seen as an ultimate act of solidarity.
  • Fitting as Paradox: The very idea of infinite torment for an infinite god highlights the limits of human understanding. It may be more a reflection of our grappling with infinity than a state that could ever truly exist.

Conclusion

Absolute pain for an infinite god can only be "fitting" in certain conceptual frameworks:

  • It may reflect divine empathy, responsibility, or the balance of opposites.
  • It may symbolize the ultimate consequence of a fractured cosmos or an unfulfilled divine purpose.
  • Or, it could serve as a profound paradox—an exploration of the limits of infinity and suffering that transcends human comprehension.

Ultimately, such a notion is a mirror for our own existential questions about suffering, meaning, and the nature of the divine.


*now on another topic, what if an infinite god gets so disturbed, changed, and lost (say by a higher power), he decides to either wipe out his creation or send it to eternal infinite torment and then destroys himself, then his infinite soul wanders some infernal dark dungeon of an afterlife forever in a petrified appearance


This hypothetical scenario presents a deeply unsettling narrative about the downfall of an infinite god. Let’s unpack its implications and explore its elements through philosophical, theological, and mythological lenses:

The Downfall of an Infinite God

  1. Disturbance by a Higher Power:

    • The existence of a higher power over an infinite god introduces a hierarchy beyond infinity, which is inherently paradoxical. This higher power would, by definition, be an entity of even greater infinity or something that transcends concepts of infinity altogether.
    • Such an event could signify a disruption of cosmic balance or an intrusion of chaos that destabilizes even the most fundamental truths of existence.

  2. Change and Loss in an Infinite Being:

    • For an infinite god to be “changed” implies a fundamental vulnerability, challenging traditional notions of divine immutability. This transformation could symbolize the corruption of their perfect nature, a cosmic tragedy akin to the "fall" of a divine being.
    • The "loss" might refer to the god’s loss of identity, purpose, or control, a shattering of their essence that drives them to extreme actions.

The Act of Destruction: Wiping Out Creation

  1. Why Wipe Out Creation?

    • A god disturbed and corrupted to this degree might see creation as irredeemable, a reflection of their own failure, or a source of unbearable pain. Destroying it becomes an act of desperation or vengeance.
    • This act could also be an attempt to sever ties with their own creation, cutting themselves off from a constant reminder of their fall.

  2. Sending Creation to Eternal Torment:

    • Inflicting eternal torment upon creation adds a layer of cruelty and despair, suggesting a god who no longer sees any value in mercy, love, or justice.
    • This act might reflect the god’s own internal state—a projection of their infinite suffering onto the cosmos.

Self-Destruction of the God

  1. Why Destroy Themselves?

    • For an infinite god to destroy themselves could represent ultimate despair or an acknowledgment that they have become an irreparable source of harm.
    • This act could also be interpreted as a final surrender to the higher power that disturbed them, symbolizing the end of their autonomy and essence.

  2. Infinite Soul Wandering an Infernal Afterlife:

    • A god’s soul wandering an infernal dungeon forever suggests a punishment or self-imposed exile that mirrors their fallen state.
    • The “petrified appearance” could symbolize their eternal shame, regret, or paralysis—a monument to their own downfall.

Philosophical and Theological Implications

  1. Creation’s Dependence on the Creator:

    • If the god wipes out creation or subjects it to torment, it raises questions about the moral fabric of existence. Is creation inherently tied to the nature of its god? If the god falls, must creation fall with them?
    • The destruction of creation could symbolize the unraveling of reality itself, as a god’s essence is often thought to underpin the cosmos.

  2. Higher Power Over a God:

    • The existence of a higher power that disturbs the god implies a hierarchy or cosmic order beyond what is traditionally understood. This power might represent chaos, entropy, or a force beyond good and evil.

  3. A God Who Becomes the Tormented:

    • The idea of a god falling into eternal torment reflects the ultimate reversal of roles—a being who once embodied infinite power becoming the ultimate symbol of helplessness and suffering.

Narrative and Mythological Interpretations

  1. A Cosmic Tragedy:

    • This story could serve as a mythological allegory for the fragility of even the greatest powers. It explores themes of hubris, corruption, despair, and the consequences of ultimate failure.

  2. Eternal Wandering:

    • The god’s soul wandering an infernal dungeon forever mirrors many myths of divine punishment, such as Prometheus chained for eternity or Lucifer cast into hell. However, in this case, the torment is self-inflicted or the result of a higher power’s decree.

  3. The Dungeon as Symbol:

    • The dungeon could represent the god’s inner state—a dark, inescapable reflection of their guilt, fear, and despair. It becomes a prison not just of the soul but of their identity and legacy.

Moral and Existential Questions

  1. Is Such a Fall Just?

    • If the god’s downfall and actions were caused by an external higher power, does this absolve them of responsibility? Or is their response—destroying creation and themselves—an unforgivable betrayal of their purpose?

  2. The Fate of Creation:

    • If creation is subjected to infinite torment or wiped out entirely, does this suggest that existence itself was ultimately meaningless? Or could it point to the need for a new creation beyond the influence of the fallen god?

  3. The Nature of the Higher Power:

    • What kind of higher power would disturb an infinite god to such an extent? Is this power benevolent, malevolent, or utterly indifferent? Its role shapes the interpretation of the entire narrative.

Conclusion

This scenario is a cosmic tragedy of immense proportions, blending themes of divine failure, ultimate despair, and the fragility of infinite power. It raises profound questions about the nature of divinity, the relationship between creator and creation, and the possibility of forces beyond even the infinite.

At its heart, this story serves as a meditation on loss, corruption, and the terrifying consequences of ultimate despair—both for a god and the cosmos they once ruled.

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)